Maar Daalo Usay!!!
The other day I came out of yet another movie with the same thought!
What is going to follow in this post is definitely not a collection of archaic thoughts of a hypocritical moron, about vulgarity in cinema or the sorts. Perhaps it is an increasing trend, which has escaped the attention of most in reel as well as real life. Many incidences of extreme behavior on the part of men have a direct or indirect association with instigation by women. The defense minister in RDB gets shot at, at the behest of a certain Sonia and a hardened criminal attempts to reform to retain his relationship with his love interest in the movie Gangster. Both these instances, leave me wondering, whether such portrayals of strong roles played out by women in the life of men, today, are depictions of a realization that has dawned on movie makers now, or is it is the caricature of a new dimension to the changed gender equations as we see it today. I am forced to ask myself whether such a strong influence by women on men had always existed without our acquiescence or is it an emergent phenomenon, which is taking shape as a result of rapidly changing gender equations.
I have a suspicion that women had always exerted strong influences on the impressionable minds of men. However, social constructs of the past had restrained men from being able to admit it in the open. It is now, that the skeletons are emerging out of the closet and furthering the change in gender equations. Now, this suspicion of mine is not based on mere conjecture but draws heavily from evidences of women demonstrating far greater intuition and stronger minds. And more often than not, strong decisions require strength of conviction and tremendous belief in your intuitive self, which men have made conspicuous by its relative absence in themselves.
However, this leads me onto another paradox, which I find equally, if not more, puzzling. Traditionally, any incumbent regime of any nature, be it political, social or economic, has always demonstrated resistance to any kind of upheaval or threat which challenges its authority. Kings would go to war against invaders; religious puritans even today oppose change in prevalent culture or influx of foreign culture; business tycoons defend their empire against attempts to take over. However, the absence of any sign of protest or attempt to retain their position of strength as far the gender equations in society are concerned, on the part of men is extremely puzzling. Females protesting against male domination are hardly seen as out of place now. But any attempt to convince women about maintenance of status quo would not only be seen as out of place but, I believe, have to contend with a lot of condemnation as well.
This is not to say that this is my attempt to act as the harbinger of jihad against attempts to usurp the male dominion of power. I am merely expressing my surprise at the existence of such an anomaly to hitherto observed patterns. And absence of resistance by men is definately an anomaly.
Now, many might say that women are increasingly gaining a position of strength, as they are increasingly beginning to occupy domains, which traditionally had belonged to men. The role of being bread earners is no longer restricted to men and women are no longer restricted to the confines of the home. But contrast this against behavior of other animal species. Lions, for example, have always had the males protecting territory and the pride and females were always delegated the responsibility to hunt. In spite of the responsibility of arranging for food resting with the females, the males’ position of strength has remained unchallenged. Even today after centuries, the male eats the food hunted by the females, before the females. Therefore, I don’t see much of a correlation between the position of strength and the role of bread earning.
That brings us back to the same issue with which we started out. If the roles assumed by men and women are not the sole deciding criterion for assumption of power, there has to be something else to it. And that ‘it’, I believe is the stronger mind and superior intuitive powers possessed by women. Ironically for both these characteristics, women owe it to men. In a certain sense, women evolved into beings of stronger minds and intuition primarily because of the centuries of subjugation by men. Unfortunately for men, in this battle of the sexes the wherewithal possessed my woman has been ‘leaked’ by their own brethren, perpetrators of tyranny.
Still confused…phew!!!
What is going to follow in this post is definitely not a collection of archaic thoughts of a hypocritical moron, about vulgarity in cinema or the sorts. Perhaps it is an increasing trend, which has escaped the attention of most in reel as well as real life. Many incidences of extreme behavior on the part of men have a direct or indirect association with instigation by women. The defense minister in RDB gets shot at, at the behest of a certain Sonia and a hardened criminal attempts to reform to retain his relationship with his love interest in the movie Gangster. Both these instances, leave me wondering, whether such portrayals of strong roles played out by women in the life of men, today, are depictions of a realization that has dawned on movie makers now, or is it is the caricature of a new dimension to the changed gender equations as we see it today. I am forced to ask myself whether such a strong influence by women on men had always existed without our acquiescence or is it an emergent phenomenon, which is taking shape as a result of rapidly changing gender equations.
I have a suspicion that women had always exerted strong influences on the impressionable minds of men. However, social constructs of the past had restrained men from being able to admit it in the open. It is now, that the skeletons are emerging out of the closet and furthering the change in gender equations. Now, this suspicion of mine is not based on mere conjecture but draws heavily from evidences of women demonstrating far greater intuition and stronger minds. And more often than not, strong decisions require strength of conviction and tremendous belief in your intuitive self, which men have made conspicuous by its relative absence in themselves.
However, this leads me onto another paradox, which I find equally, if not more, puzzling. Traditionally, any incumbent regime of any nature, be it political, social or economic, has always demonstrated resistance to any kind of upheaval or threat which challenges its authority. Kings would go to war against invaders; religious puritans even today oppose change in prevalent culture or influx of foreign culture; business tycoons defend their empire against attempts to take over. However, the absence of any sign of protest or attempt to retain their position of strength as far the gender equations in society are concerned, on the part of men is extremely puzzling. Females protesting against male domination are hardly seen as out of place now. But any attempt to convince women about maintenance of status quo would not only be seen as out of place but, I believe, have to contend with a lot of condemnation as well.
This is not to say that this is my attempt to act as the harbinger of jihad against attempts to usurp the male dominion of power. I am merely expressing my surprise at the existence of such an anomaly to hitherto observed patterns. And absence of resistance by men is definately an anomaly.
Now, many might say that women are increasingly gaining a position of strength, as they are increasingly beginning to occupy domains, which traditionally had belonged to men. The role of being bread earners is no longer restricted to men and women are no longer restricted to the confines of the home. But contrast this against behavior of other animal species. Lions, for example, have always had the males protecting territory and the pride and females were always delegated the responsibility to hunt. In spite of the responsibility of arranging for food resting with the females, the males’ position of strength has remained unchallenged. Even today after centuries, the male eats the food hunted by the females, before the females. Therefore, I don’t see much of a correlation between the position of strength and the role of bread earning.
That brings us back to the same issue with which we started out. If the roles assumed by men and women are not the sole deciding criterion for assumption of power, there has to be something else to it. And that ‘it’, I believe is the stronger mind and superior intuitive powers possessed by women. Ironically for both these characteristics, women owe it to men. In a certain sense, women evolved into beings of stronger minds and intuition primarily because of the centuries of subjugation by men. Unfortunately for men, in this battle of the sexes the wherewithal possessed my woman has been ‘leaked’ by their own brethren, perpetrators of tyranny.
Still confused…phew!!!